Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
| Dimir Midrange | keggers | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Midrange | silversane | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Midrange | reddragon8000 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Tokens Control , Cats Aggro , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash
Meta Performance Analysis
Faebloom Trick ranks #232 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 68%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 58.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Faebloom Trick is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 9.11 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Faebloom Trick has a win rate of 66.3%, making it 4.1% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shardmage's Rescue | Enchantment — Aura | 14 | 66.3% | 3 |
| Subterranean Schooner | Artifact — Vehicle | 8 | 65.9% | 1 |
| Virtue of Loyalty | Enchantment // Instant — Adventure | 19 | 64.0% | 5 |
| Steel Seraph | Artifact Creature — Angel | 36 | 61.5% | 10 |
| Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 5 | 61.5% | 0 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 18 | 61.0% | 4 |
| Plumecreed Escort | Creature — Bird Scout | 8 | 59.8% | 3 |
| Protect the Negotiators | Instant | 37 | 58.8% | 10 |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 40 | 58.2% | 13 |
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 30 | 56.0% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Faebloom Trick than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 14 | 72.4% | 67.3% | +5.1% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 17 | 68.1% | 66.8% | +1.3% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 15 | 67.8% | 67.1% | +0.7% |
| Sheoldred's Edict | Instant | 2 | 13 | 63.8% | 63.4% | +0.4% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 17 | 67.9% | 67.7% | +0.2% |
| Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 4 | 15 | 66.3% | 66.4% | -0.1% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 17 | 67.9% | 68.0% | -0.1% |
| Phantom Interference | Instant | 1 | 15 | 66.3% | 66.7% | -0.4% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 16 | 67.6% | 68.2% | -0.5% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 17 | 66.3% | 66.8% | -0.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 694 | 33.7% | 49.6% |
| Dimir Bounce | 77 | 15.7% | 53.3% |
| Azorius Flash | 38 | 16.9% | 56.4% |
| Azorius Control | 5 | 1.4% | 53.7% |
| Temur Otters | 4 | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.